A novel quality‐related process monitoring method for multi‐unit industrial processes under incomplete data conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Modern industrial processes usually consist of multiple local units. With the wide application of distributed control systems, a large amount of industrial data is collected. During data acquisition and transmission, outliers and missing data commonly exist in different local units. Under such incomplete data conditions, the detection performance of traditional quality‐related process monitoring methods may be seriously degraded. This study develops a novel quality‐related process monitoring method for multi‐unit industrial processes. Considering the existence of outliers and missing data, incomplete data preprocessing is first performed on raw process data and quality data. Then, process variables are divided into several blocks according to the process knowledge. Afterwards, the quality‐related features extracted by variational information bottleneck (VIB) are used to train deep support vector data description (DSVDD). Finally, a quality‐related process monitoring strategy is designed at both block and global levels. Experimental results on the revised Tennessee Eastman process demonstrate that the proposed method has better monitoring performance under incomplete data conditions than other state‐of‐the‐art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".