MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283363910 · doi:10.1080/15622975.2022.2093969

Elevated regional cerebral blood flow in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

2022· article· en· W4283363910 on OpenAlexafffund
Maurice Pasternak, Zahra Shirzadi, Henk Mutsaerts, Erik Boot, Nancy J. Butcher, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Tracy Heung, Anne S. Bassett, Mario Masellis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreChild and Family Research InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsRijksdienst voor Ondernemend Nederland
KeywordsCerebral blood flowNeuroimagingMedicinePutamenPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)CardiologyPsychosisInternal medicineNeurosciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent chromosome 22q11.2 deletions cause 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS), a multisystem disorder associated with high rates of schizophrenia. Neuroanatomical changes on brain MRI have been reported in relation to 22q11DS. However, to date no 22q11DS neuroimaging studies have examined cerebral blood flow (CBF). This exploratory case-control study seeks to identify differences in regional cerebral blood flow between 22q11DS subjects and controls, and their association with psychotic symptoms. METHODS: This study of 23 adults used arterial spin labelling MRI to investigate voxel-wise CBF in 22q11DS individuals compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: analysis determined that this elevation in CBF trended with psychotic symptom diagnosis within the 22q11DS group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest possible relevance to schizophrenia risk and support further functional neuroimaging studies of 22q11DS with larger sample sizes to improve our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe World Journal of Biological PsychiatrySame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207