MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283378874 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.19501954.v1

Multi-Class Object Detection Using Adaptive Non-Maximum Suppression in Dense Images

2022· preprint· en· W4283378874 on OpenAlexaff
YONGKEUN LEE, Stephen Makonin, KyeongMi Noh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimum bounding boxObject (grammar)Constraint (computer-aided design)Object detectionBounding overwatchComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceClass (philosophy)Pattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmImage (mathematics)Computer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning-based object detection technology is actively studied, and non-maximum suppression (NMS) is an algorithm used to remove redundant object detection. NMS creates a bounding box for objects detected using a fixed ratio to determine the probability of an object being present. However, this constraint does not solve the difficulty in detecting objects that significantly overlap or are too small. Soft-NMS is an improvement. Nevertheless, free parameter values are manually chosen to provide non-optimal results. Our proposed Adaptive-NMS algorithm (1) calculates the optimal free parameters in real-time and (2) provides for multi-class object detection in highly dense images, improving results over Soft-NMS up to 12.2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207