MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PB1820: CD47-BLOCKER TTI-622 COMBINED WITH AZACITIDINE IN PATIENTS WITH TP53-MUTATED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA (AML) AND WITH AZACITIDINE + VENETOCLAX IN ELDERLY OR UNFIT PATIENTS WITH TP53-WILDTYPE AML

2022· article· en· W4283379313 on OpenAlexaff
Naval Daver, M. Maris, R. Ramchandren, D. Bixby, Kimberly R. Doucette, R. Mawad, D. Egan, Donald L.I. Stevens, J. Zonder, N. Molloy, A. Scheuber, I. Bruns, I. Mantzaris, M. Konopleva, A. D. Goldberg

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Canadian institutionsTrillium Therapeutics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenetoclaxAzacitidineCD47MedicineMyeloid leukemiaMyeloidHypomethylating agentLeukemiaCancer researchOncologyMinimal residual diseaseInternal medicineImmunologyChronic lymphocytic leukemiaBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: CD47 is an innate immune checkpoint that binds signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) and delivers a “don’t eat me” signal to suppress macrophage phagocytosis. TTI-622 is a fusion protein consisting of the CD47-binding domain of human SIRPα linked to the Fc region of human IgG4. It is designed to enhance phagocytosis and antitumor activity by preventing CD47 from delivering its inhibitory signal as well as generating a moderate pro-phagocytic signal via IgG4 Fc. Importantly, unlike many CD47-blocking agents, TTI-622 does not bind to human red blood cells. Increased expression of CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) due to its association with reduced event-free and overall survival, and blockade of CD47 has shown pre-clinical and clinical activity in AML. In vitro, both azacitidine and venetoclax significantly enhanced the pro-phagocytic effect of TTI-622 on macrophages. Aims: To characterize the safety and preliminary efficacy profile of TTI-622 in combination with azacitidine in newly diagnosed TP53-mutated AML and in combination with azacitidine + venetoclax in elderly or unfit, newly diagnosed TP53-wildtype AML. Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of TTI-622 combined with azacitidine ± venetoclax will also be investigated. Primary endpoints include dose-limiting toxicities, incidence of adverse events (AEs) and complete response (CR). Minimal residual disease status will also be evaluated. Methods: As part of an ongoing dose-escalation and expansion trial of TTI-622 (NCT03530683), patients with AML meeting the below key entry criterion are enrolled. Cohort A includes patients with newly diagnosed TP53-mutated AML. Cohort B includes patients with newly diagnosed TP53-wildtype AML who are either elderly (375 years) or unfit. Unfit patients include those < 75 years with one or more of the following comorbidities: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, clinically significant heart or lung comorbidities, contraindication to anthracycline therapy, or other comorbidity the investigator regards as incompatible with intensive remission induction chemotherapy. All patients from both cohorts must have documented bone marrow or peripheral blast counts 3 20% and must have received no prior systemic therapy for AML nor hypomethylating agents for any antecedent hematologic disorders prior to transformation to AML. Patients must have no extramedullary disease or leukocytosis >25,000/mL. Renal function must be 330 mL/minute based on Cockcroft-Gault estimate. There are no restrictions based on neutrophil or platelet counts, or hemoglobin level. Patients with AML secondary to antecedent hematologic disorders or therapy induced will not comprise more than 50% of either Cohort. Up to 30 patients will be enrolled into each cohort. In 28-day cycles, patients in both Cohorts will receive TTI-622 8 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusions weekly combined with azacitidine 75 mg/m2 administered either IV or subcutaneously for 7 consecutive days, repeated approximately every 4 weeks. Patients in Cohort B will also receive venetoclax 100 mg and 200 mg orally on Days 1 and 2, respectively, followed by 400 mg (or equivalent adjusted for azoles) daily thereafter. Safety monitoring includes clinical laboratories and assessments of AEs based on CTCAE v 4.03. Response assessments of both bone marrow and peripheral blood are performed at the end of Cycles 1, 2 and 4; and then every 3 cycles thereafter. Response assessment is per the ELN2017 criteria. Results: Results N/A (trial-in-progress) Summary/Conclusion: Conclusion N/A (trial-in-progress)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationFrench-language works237,207