MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283383829 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2022.170

P.071 Case report: cheiro-oral syndrome secondary to thalamic ischemic stroke

2022· article· en· W4283383829 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Y Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThalamusStroke (engine)Presentation (obstetrics)NeuroimagingRadiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patient with small thalamic infarct may present with a variety of subtle and seemingly disconnected sensory deficits which can be easily missed. Methods: Here we report a case of an 80 years ‘old Chinese female presenting sudden onset persistent sensory symptoms over perioral area and right hand. The patient underwent further investigation with Brain MRI. The patient underwent further investigation with Brain MRI. A literature review was conducted and the patient’s clinical finding was compared with the literature. Results: The patient’s presentation was consistent with clinical manifestation of type 1 Cheiro-Oral syndrome. Brain MRI performed the day after admission revealed small non-hemorrhagic infarction involving the left thalamus. The diagnosis was type 1 cheiro-oral syndrome secondary to left thalamic ischemic stroke. Conclusions: This report highlights both clinical presentations of cheiro-oral syndrome and correlating clinical symptomatology with anatomic localization. It is important for physicians to recognize this rare condition with subtle presentations for complete work-up and definitive treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207