Geology and genesis of the North Narbaghi Cu-Ag deposit in the Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc, Iran: Fluid inclusion and stable isotope constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The North Narbaghi Cu-Ag deposit in the central part of the Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc (UDMA) of Iran is hosted by Eocene volcanic sequences and Oligo-Miocene intrusions of arc affiliation. The mineralization can be divided into five stages that are represented by barren hydrothermal breccias, Cu-Fe sulfides cementing in the breccias, sulfosalt and sulfide hydrothermal breccias, barren post-ore quartz veinlets, and barren post-ore calcite veinlets, respectively. The metallic minerals consist of pyrite, chalcopyrite, bornite, sphalerite, and tennantite-tetrahedrite, which are variably associated with gangue minerals including quartz, calcite, and sericite. The upper parts of the ores have been oxidized to form supergene minerals including malachite, azurite, chrysocolla, chalcocite, covellite, hematite, and goethite. The ore-related hydrothermal alteration includes silicification, pyritization, carbonatization, intermediate argillitization, and propylitic alteration. Primary fluid inclusion assemblages in quartz associated with main-stage sulfides and sulfosalts have homogenization temperatures ranging from 184° to 385 °C and calculated salinities between 12.0 and 29.7 wt% NaCl equiv. (avg. 21.4 wt% NaCl equiv.). The coexistence of fluid inclusion assemblages with highly variable volume percentages of vapor phase indicates that boiling commonly occurred in the hydrothermal system, contributing to Cu saturation. Sulfide minerals range in δ34S from −1.5 to 3.7 ‰, indicating a probable magmatic sulfur source. This view is further supported by the carbon and oxygen isotopes of hydrothermal carbonates, with δ13CPDB of −2.2 to −1.5 ‰ and δ18OSMOW between 5.30 and 11.75 ‰. Stable isotope and fluid inclusion data illustrate that boiling of the ore fluid and its mixing with meteoric water facilitated mineralization at the North Narbaghi. We suggest that the North Narbaghi Cu-Ag deposit can be best interpreted as an intermediate-sulfidation epithermal deposit formed due to post-Eocene magmatic-hydrothermal activity. The intersections of post-Eocene subvolcanic rocks with regional faults were the most favorable sites for focusing fluids responsible for epithermal mineralization along the UDMA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".