MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283390752 · doi:10.1017/s1755773922000030

EPR volume 14 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

2022· article· en· W4283390752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Political Science Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversity of California, IrvineFreie Universität BerlinUniversité de MontréalTel Aviv UniversityUniversità degli Studi di TrentoVrije Universiteit AmsterdamStockholms UniversitetUniversity of OxfordEuropean University InstituteErasmus Universiteit RotterdamUniversity of BristolUniversitat Pompeu FabraUniversity of PittsburghLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of California, DavisHarvard UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Action (physics)Computer sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measuring satisfaction with democracy: how good are different scales across countries and languages? Carlos poses and Melanie revilla Going in circles? The influence of the electoral cycle on the party behaviour in parliament Jan Schwalbach Political and ideological normalization: quality of government, mainstream-right ideological positions and extreme-right support Christos vrakopoulos Plebiscites: a tool for dictatorship alberto penads and Sergio velasco The potentials of heresthetic and rhetoric in an open framing situation: theory and evidence from a survey experiment andrs Krsnyi, veronika patks, Bendegz plesz and pl Susnszky

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it