MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P1152: RESULTS FROM A PHASE I PHARMACOKINETIC (PK) AND SAFETY STUDY OF TRPH-222, A NOVEL CD22-TARGETING ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE, IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY B-CELL NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA (R/R NHL)

2022· article· en· W4283392950 on OpenAlexaff
Francisco J. Hernandez‐Ilizaliturri, John Kuruvilla, Beth Christian, Ian W. Flinn, Sarit Assouline, Matthew L. Ulrickson, Daniel J. Landsburg, H. Lowman, N. Levin, D. Maetzel, N. N. Viller, A. MacLaren

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityPharmacokineticsAntibody-drug conjugateInternal medicineCmaxRefractory (planetary science)Phases of clinical researchGastroenterologyLymphomaOncologyAntibodyPharmacologyToxicityAdverse effectMonoclonal antibodyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: TRPH-222 is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody and maytansine, a potent microtubule inhibitor, joined by a novel third-generation linker-conjugation technology (SMARTag®). This approach enables site-specific conjugation of the maytansine payload while tightly controlling drug:antibody ratio (DAR), resulting in a highly stable anti-CD22 ADC with a non-cleavable linker designed to widen the therapeutic window. Aims: The primary objectives of this first in human study are to determine the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TRPH-222 monotherapy in patients with R/R NHL. Methods: TRPH-222-100 is an open-label, multicenter study comprised of dose-escalation and dose-expansion stages. TRPH-222 was administered IV once every 3 weeks. 22 patients were enrolled in dose-escalating cohorts of TRPH-222 (0.6 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg) from DLBCL, FL, TFL, MCL and MZL histologies, and 10 patients in a dose-expansion cohort (7.5 mg/kg) focusing on DLBCL and FL histologies. Results: As of January 7, 2022, 32 NHL patients have been enrolled: 15 indolent (14 FL and 1 MZL) and 17 aggressive histologies (15 DLBCL, 1 TFL and 1 MCL). Patients had a median age of 64.5 years, a median of 4 prior lines of therapy including 7 patients receiving prior CAR-T treatment. Three DLTs occurred in 2 patients during the study and comprised Grade 3 and 4 transaminase elevations; one each at 4.2 and 10 mg/kg and one Grade 3 thrombocytopenia at 4.2 mg/kg. Treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 2 patients (6.3%), caused by thrombocytopenia and pyrexia (both at 7.5 mg/kg TRPH-222). AEs were more prevalent at doses ≥7.5 mg/kg and less prevalent at lower doses. There was a trend to higher grade AEs in patients with aggressive histologies, compared to indolent ones. The most frequent (≥ 5%) treatment-emergent related AEs (Grade ≥3) included thrombocytopenia (34%), neutropenia (22%), ALT/AST elevation (6%), dry eye (6%) and blurred vision (6%). Cytopenias were non-febrile, infrequent, asymptomatic and resolved without significant intervention. Ocular findings were consistent with known epithelial keratopathy of ADCs and were generally low grade and resolved to ≤ Grade 1 with dose interruptions and/or reductions. Overall, TRPH-222 demonstrated a favourable safety profile with most AEs being predominantly low grade, tolerable, easily managed and reversible. Preliminary efficacy results suggest evidence of anti-tumor activity, most notably in patients with R/R FL. Of the 13 response-evaluable FL patients, 4 complete responses (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR) were observed, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 31%. Four patients with metabolic CRs maintained these CRs for long periods off treatment; 3 patients remain in CR with responses maintained for up to 25 months. Responses were generally early, durable and CRs were maintained off-therapy. Beyond FL, CRs were also observed in 1 DLBCL patient and in 1 MCL patient. Summary/Conclusion: TRPH-222 was found to be well tolerated at higher dose levels than evaluated for other ADCs. TRPH-222 monotherapy resulted in robust and durable CRs in FL across dose levels where patients were able to discontinue TRPH-222 while remaining in remissions. Collectively, these characteristics of TRPH-222 are favorable for further development in the indolent lymphoma setting either as monotherapy or in combination with other anti-tumor agents in B-cell lymphoma patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207