TaPR1 Interacts With TaTLP1 via the αIV Helix to Be Involved in Wheat Defense to Puccinia triticina Through the CAPE1 Motif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins play important roles in plant defense response and systemic acquired resistance (SAR). PR1 has antifungal activity against many plant pathogens. In our previous study, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was conducted on resistant wheat line TcLr19 and sensitive wheat cultivar Chinese Spring inoculated with Puccinia triticina ( Pt ) race PHNT. In this study, seven salicylic acid (SA)-induced TaPR1 genes involved in plant disease resistance were found in the RNA-seq library. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) results showed that TaPR1-4 was most induced by Pt among these seven TaPR1 genes in the incompatible interaction. Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) results showed that TaPR1-4 interacted with TaTLP1 via the αIV helix. Protein-mediated phenotyping assays in vivo and antifungal activity in vitro demonstrated that wheat leaves infiltrated with pure TaPR1-4 protein developed significantly less disease compared to control leaves. This effect was correlated with a strong increase in defense gene expression, and resistance activity was dependent on the CAPE1 motif located in the C-terminal region of TaPR1-4. These findings increase current knowledge regarding the interaction of TaPR1 and TaTLP1 and provide new insights on the role of TaPR1 protein in the resistance of wheat to Pt .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".