MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283456084 · doi:10.1145/3530190.3534828

Note: Image-based Prediction of House Attributes with Deep Learning

2022· article· en· W4283456084 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alex Olson, Elias B. Khalil, Shoshanna Saxe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningArtificial intelligenceTask (project management)Scale (ratio)Mean squared errorImage (mathematics)Artificial neural networkMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)CartographyStatisticsGeographyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an image dataset and a deep learning model that enable the prediction of attributes such as floor area for low-rise buildings (i.e., houses). The dataset consists of 34,600 images of 16,403 buildings in the city of Toronto, Canada, each of which is associated with floor area. The ability to predict such an attribute can facilitate accurate, automated city-scale analysis of the built environment, which can then serve as a basis for policy evaluation and recommendation. A deep convolutional neural network is devised for the task, achieving normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) of 34.24% for interior floor area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207