Seasonal Aspects of Radiative and Advective Air Temperature Populations: A Canadian Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian high-frequency temperature time series exhibit physical heterogeneity in the coexistence of radiative and advective populations in the total air temperature sample. This work examines forty-five Canadian hourly air temperature records to study seasonal characteristics and variability of radiative and advective population counts and their corresponding temperature biases and trends. The Linear Pattern Discrimination algorithm, conceptualized in a previous study, was adjusted to seasonal analysis on the equinox-to-equinox time scale. Count analysis of radiative and advective days supports the existence of two distinct thermal regimes, Spring–Summer and Fall–Winter. Further, seasonal advective counts for the majority of examined stations typically decrease in numbers. The consistently warmer winter radiative temperature extrema points to the critical role of the advective population in control of the overall temperature magnitude. Canadian northwest warming trends are found to be the highest, indicating the amplifying effect of decreasing advective counts with rapidly increasing temperatures that weaken the advective population’s moderating ability to control the magnitude of the total temperature population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".