MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283459755 · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2022.855435

Editorial: Understanding Urban Health Disparities: Family Planning Access and Use Among the Urban Poor in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

2022· editorial· en· W4283459755 on OpenAlexaff
James Duminy, Onikepe Owolabi, Moazzam Ali, Moses Tetui

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Global Women s Health · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUK Research and InnovationWorld Health OrganizationBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsLow and middle income countriesLow incomeEnvironmental healthGeographyEconomic growthBusinessSocioeconomicsDeveloping countryMedicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL article Front. Glob. Womens Health, 22 June 2022Sec. Contraception and Family Planning https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.855435

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0150.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Global Women s HealthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207