MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283466832 · doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07546-5

Clinical relevance of the cagA and vacA s1m1 status and antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4283466832 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohsen Karbalaei, Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi, Masoud Keikha

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMashhad University of Medical SciencesUniversity of Jiroft
KeywordsCagAHelicobacter pyloriMeta-analysisPublication biasCochrane LibraryMetronidazoleClarithromycinOdds ratioMedicineAntibiotic resistanceAmoxicillinSubgroup analysisInternal medicineMedical microbiologyMicrobiologyBiologyAntibioticsVirulenceImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) virulence factors of such as vacA s1m1 and cagA in designating clinical outcomes and eradication rate has been deeply challenged in the last decade. The goal of this analysis was to identify the potential relevance between cagA and vacA genotypes with reported antibiotic resistance observed in clinical H. pylori isolates. METHODS: This literature search was conducted in databases such as Clarivate analytics, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, DOAJ, and Google Scholar by April 2022, regardless of language restrictions and publication date. Quality of the included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Statistical analysis of retrieved studies was fulfilled using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 2.2. Following quality appraisal of eligible studies, potential association between the status of cagA and vacA genes with resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and levofloxacin was measured using odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. We also used sensitivity analyses and meta-regression to eliminate the source of heterogeneity from the overall estimates. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot, Egger's test, Begg's test with the trim and fill procedure to assess the presence and magnitude of publication bias in the included studies. RESULTS: Our findings suggested that a significant relationship between cagA status ‎and increase resistance ‎to metronidazole (OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.24-5.83‎‏‎). In subgroup analysis, we ‎found that in the Western ‎population, infection with cagA-positive strains could be led to increase in ‎the resistance to ‎metronidazole (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: ‎0.78-3.21‎‏‎), ‎amoxicillin (OR: ‎19.68‎; 95% CI: 2.74-‎‎141.18), ‎and ‎levofloxacin (OR: ‎11.33; 95% CI: ‎1.39-‎‎91.85). After implementation of trim and fill method, the adjusted OR was not significantly differed from original estimates which in turn represented our subgroup analysis was statistically robust. On the other hand, vacA ‎genotypes usually ‎reduce the antibiotic resistance of this bacterium, so that vacA s1m1 significantly reduces the ‎resistance to ‎metronidazole (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.20-0.86‎‏‎). Surprisingly, resistance of vacA s2m2 strains to antibiotics was low, the reason may be due ‎to the non-inflammatory properties of strains containing vacA s2m2. The meta-regression and sensitivity analyses successfully reduced the effect of heterogeneity from the overall estimates. In addition, although the pooled OR is reduced after trim and fill adjustment but results do not change the conclusion regarding vacA genotypes and antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, it was clearly demonstrated that cagA-positive strains are resistance to metronidazole, especially in Western countries. In Western countries, vacA s1m1 increases resistance to amoxicillin and levofloxacin. Based on the present findings, the vacA s1m1 genotype significantly increases resistance to metronidazole, while the vacA s1m2 decreases resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole. Resistance to antibiotics in less virulent (vacA s2m2) strains is statistically significant lower than others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Infectious DiseasesSame topicHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesFrench-language works237,207