Automatic femoral articular cartilage segmentation using deep learning in three-dimensional ultrasound images of the knee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based approach to automatically segment the femoral articular cartilage (FAC) in 3D ultrasound (US) images of the knee to increase time efficiency and decrease rater variability. Our method involved deep learning predictions on 2DUS slices sampled in the transverse plane to view the cartilage of the femoral trochlea, followed by reconstruction into a 3D surface. A 2D U-Net was modified and trained using a dataset of 200 2DUS images resliced from 20 3DUS images. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using a holdout dataset of 50 2DUS images resliced from 5 3DUS images. Absolute and signed error metrics were computed and FAC segmentation performance was compared between rater 1 and 2 manual segmentations. Our U-Net-based algorithm performed with mean 3D DSC, recall, precision, VPD, MSD, and HD of 73.1 ± 3.9%, 74.8 ± 6.1%, 72.0 ± 6.3%, 10.4 ± 6.0%, 0.3 ± 0.1 mm, and 1.6 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Compared to the individual 2D predictions, our algorithm demonstrated a decrease in performance after 3D reconstruction, but these differences were not found to be statistically significant. The percent difference between the manually segmented volumes of the 2 raters was 3.4%, and rater 2 demonstrated the largest VPD with 14.2 ± 11.4 mm3 compared to 10.4 ± 6.0 mm3 for rater 1. This study investigated the use of a modified U-Net algorithm to automatically segment the FAC in 3DUS knee images of healthy volunteers, demonstrating that this segmentation method would increase the efficiency of anterior femoral cartilage volume estimation and expedite the post-acquisition processing for 3D US images of the knee.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".