Screening for Immune-Related RNA Biomarkers of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis based on the immune microenvironment, this study aimed to identify immune-related RNA biomarkers that indicate aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS: The GSE73378 dataset was downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information GEO database, providing blood from 107 normal controls and 103 patients with aSAH. The immune infiltration types in the aSAH blood samples were assessed and RNAs that were differentially expressed (DE) between 1) the aSAH and control groups and 2) the immune infiltration groups (high and low) were identified. The intersecting genes were subjected to weighted gene co-expression network analysis followed by co-expression network construction. The aSAH-related genes and pathways were identified from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2019. RESULTS: A total of three DE long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and 301 DE mRNAs were identified. Of the 301 mRNAs, 91 were significantly enriched in three modules. Based on the 91 mRNAs and three lncRNAs, a co-expression network related to the disease pathway was constructed. This pathway consisted of 16 factors, including the 13 mRNAs (e.g., TNFSF13B, TNFSF10, MYD88, GNA12 and NSMAF) and three lncRNAs (FAM66A, LINC00954 and CELF2-AS2), as well as six pathways, including the NF-κB, toll-like receptor, and sphingolipid signalling pathways. CONCLUSION: TNFSF13B, MYD88, GNA12, NSMAF, FAM66A, LINC00954 and CELF2-AS2 may serve as biomarkers for aSAH. The NF-κB, toll-like receptor and sphingolipid signalling pathways may play critical roles in the progression of aSAH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".