MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pope Paul II

2022· reference-entry· en· W4283525094 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2022
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyHumanismClassicsMeaning (existential)HistoryPhilosophyAncient historyTheologyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wedged between the prolific humanist Pius II and the arch-nepotist Sixtus IV, Paul II is one of the more easily overlooked popes of the 15th century. Pietro Barbo was born in Venice in 1417, into an extensive network of interconnected clerically dominated families that had recently produced two popes, Gregory XII (r. 1406–1415) and Eugenius IV (r. 1431–1447). It was Eugenius who raised Barbo to the cardinalate in 1440. Nicholas V (r. 1447–1455) promoted him from being cardinal deacon of S. Maria Nuova to cardinal priest of S. Marco, the most fitting choice for a Venetian, but when Pius II (r. 1458–1464) chose him to fill the episcopal vacancy at Padua in 1459 it created a diplomatic crisis between Venice and Rome. On 30 August 1464 Barbo was elected to succeed Pius, but his initial desire to take Mark as his papal name was rejected by the cardinal electors and he became Pope Paul II. He died on 26 July 1471. The key features of his life and pontificate can be found in any number of Reference Works, though separate Overviews are relatively scarce. Primary Sources are certainly not in short supply, meaning that they are divided for present purposes into Papal Lives and Other Sources. Those sources duly inspired the classic history of the papacy and the recent biography which are paired under the heading Lives and Times, as well as the more detailed research published in Collections of Papers and a specialist Journal. From that point the structure of this article is dictated by the distinctive features of Paul’s pontificate. Curia Romana brings together a number of studies on papal administration, but its positioning is dictated by a relatively minor organizational change. That triggered a reaction among the curialists who lost their employment and can therefore be linked to the humanists of the Roman Academy and their alleged plot to murder the pope in 1468. That episode provides the bulk of the material included as Literary Culture, which might otherwise appear less prominently. Paul’s literary interests have been a matter of debate, but there is no doubt about his interest in and patronage of Art, Architecture and Urban Planning. If this article is thought of in terms of concentric circles, the pope was in his palace adjacent to the church of S. Marco, from which one can move outwards into Rome and the Papal States and, beyond that, Rome and the Secular Powers of western Christendom, including Venice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207