MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283574399 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt22.123

Turbulent Adsorption of VOC in Zeolite Doped Metal Foam

2022· article· en· W4283574399 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Minsin Kim, Youngwoo Kim, Kyung Chun Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionZeoliteMicroporous materialChemical engineeringMaterials scienceAerogelCoatingMixing (physics)Mass transferPorosityComposite materialChemistryCatalysisChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow through random cellular structures can lead to efficient mixing to increase system efficiency. Especially, the adsorption process through filtration is greatly influenced by the physical shape of the cellular structures In this paper, mass transfer due to structural complexity in metal foam structure is evaluated through VOCs removal rate measurement. VOCs refer to liquids or gases containing organic carbon, and generally have a characteristic of being a pollutant that diffuses very quickly. Most of the VOCs are often generated from small nonpoint pollution sources such as automobile exhaust gas and overall occurrence in factory plants Zeolite is microporous with uniform and small pores, is adsorbed by type according to pore size, has ion exchange, and high heat resistance In general, when coating the surface of complex structures such as porous media, a coating method by dipping is used. However, when the zeolite used in this study is coated with the dipping method, the organic solvent fills the micro-pores of the zeolite and reducing the adsorption power. Therefore, in this study, a new zeolite coating method using graphene ink was used to prevent the decrease in adsorption power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207