Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is overwhelming evidence that Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning, intersex, and asexual (2SLGBTQIA+) youth in Canada experience significantly higher rates of mental health problems than their heterosexual and cisgender peers. This paper argues that intersectoral action on the social determinants of health (SDOH) at all levels of government is necessary to meaningfully address 2SLGBTQIA+ youth mental health in Canada. A literature review of English-language, peer-reviewed articles and grey literature was conducted to assess the root determinants of 2SLGBTQIA+ youth mental health. This paper utilizes an intersectional lens and the 3i framework to assess the relevant ideas, interests, and institutions that fuel mental health inequities facing 2SLGBTQIA+ youth in Canada. This paper recommends a pan-Canadian 2SLGBTQIA+ Health Strategy; a shift of focus towards SDOH; improving sex education curricula and teacher training; building resilience among 2SLGBTQIA+ youth; and strengthening the shelter system to improve 2SLGBTQIA+ youth mental health in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".