MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Penanda Karakter Varitas Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L.) Berdasarkan Karakter Morfologi

2022· article· id· W4283579749 on OpenAlexaff
Devia Putri Nashira, Wisanti Wisanti, Eva Kristinawati Putri

Bibliographic record

VenueLenteraBio Berkala Ilmiah Biologi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArilHorticultureRambutanBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstrak. Rambutan merupakan buah eksotik yang banyak dibudidayakan di Indonesia. Rambutan mudah melakukan penyerbukan silang sehingga mengakibatkan tingginya kemungkinan munculnya varitas baru dan semakin sulit untuk dibedakan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dengan tujuan untuk menentukan penanda karakter morfologi rambutan. Prosedur penelitian meliputi tahap eksplorasi dan koleksi, pengamatan dan pengukuran, serta analisis penanda karakter. Eksplorasi dan koleksi dilakukan di Kecamatan Cileungsi dan Desa Bojong Kulur, Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat. Sampel penelitian berupa ranting dengan daun dan buah dari tujuh varitas rambutan meliputi Sikoneng, Binjai, Aceh Lebak, Simacan, Sinyonya, Kerikil, dan Gula Batu. Bukti morfologi berupa 6 karakter kuantitatif dan 24 karakter kualitatif. Sebanyak 30 karakter yang dianalisis dengan Principal Component Analysis untuk menentukan karakter penanda tujuh varitas rambutan. Karakter penanda yang ditentukan digunakan sebagai kunci identifikasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa karakter yang dapat digunakan antara lain: permukaan tangkai daun, bentuk ujung lamina, banyak buah pertandan, bentuk buah, warna kulit buah, berat kulit buah, kerataan warna kulit buah, ketertarikan buah, kerapatan rambut buah, warna rambut buah, warna aril, tekstur aril, kandungan air aril, aroma aril, kelekatan aril dengan kulit ari biji, kelekatan kulit ari biji dengan biji dan bentuk biji.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLenteraBio Berkala Ilmiah BiologiSame topicPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesFrench-language works237,207