MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283582861 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v13n1p56

The Impact of Overseas M&A on Performance Sensitivity of CEO Turnover: Evidence From Chinese Listed Companies

2022· article· en· W4283582861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dingdong Sun, Jiefei Zheng, Rui Liu, Zhiqiang Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessEndogeneityCorporate governanceChinaCompetition (biology)ProductivityProduct marketProduct (mathematics)AccountingIndustrial organizationFinanceEconomicsMarket economyIncentiveEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, with China’s growing economic strength driven by the reform of market economic system and the implementation of “going out” strategy, overseas M&A has become an important channel for many Chinese listed companies to optimize the resource allocation and realize the leap of global value chain. Overseas M&A not only garners the advanced technology from overseas companies, but also improves the corporate governance of the parent company. With the data of Chinese listed companies from 2003 to 2019, this paper empirically examines how overseas M&A of listed companies influences the performance sensitivity of CEO turnover, and the PSM method and placebo tests are adopted to discuss the endogeneity. Finally, we proceed the heterogeneity tests by the nature of property rights, CEO power and the market competitiveness of product, respectively. The empirical results show that overseas M&A of Chinese listed companies will significantly improve the performance sensitivity of CEO turnover, and the phenomenon is more significant in SOEs and companies with lower management shareholding ratio, older CEO age, longer tenure of CEO, and lower product market competition. The conclusion of this paper not only offers a unique theoretical perspective for China's listed companies to improve their governance efficiency through overseas M&A, but also provides policy references for improving China's overseas M&A behavior in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207