MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283583904 · doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05566-5

Sex-specific effects of localized muscle fatigue on upper body kinematics during a repetitive pointing task

2022· article· en· W4283583904 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Yang, Julie N. Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreJewish Rehabilitation Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
KeywordsMedicineTrunkUpper limbElbowUpper trunkAnatomyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationLumbarShoulder jointKinematicsOrthopedic surgeryLumbar spineScapulaThoracic spinePhysical therapySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Females are reported to have a higher risk of musculoskeletal disorders than males. Repetitive motions can lead to muscle fatigue, which may play a mediator role in the development of musculoskeletal disorders. However, sex differences in adaptations to localized fatigue at different joints are poorly understood. We examined the sex-specific effects of fatigue location on shoulder, elbow and spinal joint angles, and angular variabilities during a repetitive pointing task. METHODS: Seven males and ten females performed a 30-s standing repetitive pointing task with their right upper limb when they were non-fatigued (NF), elbow-fatigued (EF), shoulder-fatigued (SF) and trunk-fatigued (TF), while trunk and upper body tridimensional kinematic data was recorded. Joint angles and angular variabilities of shoulder, elbow, upper thoracic spine, lower thoracic spine, and lumbar spine were calculated. RESULTS: Results showed that shoulder angles changed the most after EF in males, but after SF in females. The similarities between sexes were that SF increased the variabilities at upper (lateral flexion: 0.15° greater than NF, rotation: 0.26° greater than all other conditions) and lower thoracic spine (lateral flexion: 0.13° greater than NF, rotation: averagely 0.1° greater than all other condition) in both sexes. TF altered upper thoracic spine variability (0.36° smaller than SF), lower thoracic spine angle (lateral flexion: 3.00° greater than NF, rotation: 1.68° greater than SF), and lumbar angle (averagely 1.8° smaller than all other conditions) in both sexes. However, females had greater lower thoracic spine angle (lateral flexion: 8.3° greater, p = 0.005) as well as greater upper (rotation: 0.53° greater, p = 0.006) and lower thoracic spine (rotation: 0.5° greater, p = 0.007; flexion: 0.6° greater, p = 0.014) angular variabilities than males. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that females' fatigue responses focused on the trunk and spine. Results highlight a few sex differences in adapting to localized muscle fatigue, which may help explain how sex differences in repetitive motion-related injuries differ between joints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Musculoskeletal DisordersSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207