MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283584257 · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.909683

Spring Freeze–Thaw Stimulates Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agricultural Soil

2022· article· en· W4283584257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Environmental Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of WaterlooMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsMcGill University
KeywordsDigestateCompostBiosolidsGreenhouse gasChemistryNitrous oxideCarbon dioxideEnvironmental chemistryMethaneFertilizerEnvironmental scienceAgronomyAnimal scienceAnaerobic digestionEnvironmental engineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In temperate cold regions, the gradual resurgence of soil microbial activity during spring freeze-thaw events is frequently associated with greenhouse gas emissions. Enhanced greenhouse gas fluxes during spring freeze-thaw are related to the mineralization of bioavailable substrates, which may be elevated when soil is amended with organic residues (e.g., biobased residues such as compost, digestate, biosolids). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of biobased residues, compared to urea fertilizer, on greenhouse gas emissions during spring freeze-thaw events. The field treatments included urea (170 kg N ha −1 y −1 ), composted food waste (240 kg N ha −1 y −1 ), hydrolyzed biosolids (215 kg N ha −1 y −1 ), and anaerobic digestate (231 kg N ha −1 y −1 ). Headspace gases were sampled from a closed static chamber in each replicate plot ( n = 4) and categorized with three transient spring freeze-thaw phases (waterlogged, wet, and dry). Among the treatments, nitrous oxide (N 2 O) flux was significantly different ( p < 0.05) where compost had the highest emission and digestate lowest while carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) fluxes were not significantly different ( p > 0.05). The greenhouse gas fluxes were significantly different among the freeze-thaw events ( p < 0.05) likely due to intense microbial activity and anaerobic conditions. The CO 2 and CH 4 emissions were related to N 2 O emission ( p < 0.05), and soil temperature strongly correlated with CO 2 fluxes. This suggested that soil warming driven by ambient conditions as well as the type and quantity of carbon input influenced soil microbial activity, leading to greenhouse gases production. Therefore, soil amended with biobased residues may either increase or reduce greenhouse gas fluxes during spring freeze-thaw events depending on the source and production method of the organic material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it