MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283588664 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt22.139

Numerical Investigation on Evolving Chip Geometry and Its Impact on Convective Heat Transfer during Orthogonal Cutting Processes

2022· article· en· W4283588664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsConvective heat transferConvectionHeat transferChipMechanicsMaterials scienceGeometryMechanical engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermal modeling of machine processes is a key tool to enhance product quality and surface integrity for high precision components. In this context, the cutting zone is of particular interest as significant stresses, temperature gradients and heat sources occur. To accurately model these processes, an FEM-CFD coupling has been developed. In the first step, a FEM chip formation simulation is performed which uses cutting parameters, material models, and mechanical properties. The FEM simulation is performed for an Inconel 718 workpiece. Afterwards, the generated chip geometry, temperature field, and heat source are transferred into a CFD model which quantifies the conjugate heat transfer and corresponding convective heat transfer coefficients at the fluid-solid interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it