MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283593742 · doi:10.1155/2022/5191104

Optimizing the Service Network Design Problem for Railroad Intermodal Transportation of Hazardous Materials

2022· article· en· W4283593742 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lixia Huang, Jun Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrainHazardous wasteComputer scienceSensitivity (control systems)Flow networkLinear programmingConstraint (computer-aided design)Mathematical optimizationService (business)Operations researchTransport engineeringInteger programmingEngineeringAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The service network design problem is one of the key problems in the field of railroad intermodal transportation of hazardous materials (hazmat). It lies in determining the frequency of the trains and the allocation of both hazardous and ordinary shipments to these trains, as well as the railroad connecting plan of all shipments based on the established train formation plan. Based on a unified method, we build a multiobjective mixed-integer linear-programming model that comprehensively considers both hazardous and ordinary materials, the compatibility of goods and services, the capacity of the transfer station, and the delivery time limit of each shipment. An augmented ε-constraint algorithm is customized to solve the model. Computational results of a practical example in China show that an increase of 8.4 million yuan in the total cost could reduce nearly 24541 the total risk. Moreover, the algorithms comparison and sensitivity analysis indicate that the augmented ε-constraint algorithm is a more suitable approach to handle the model because of its advantage in the uniqueness of distinct nondominated solutions. Finally, the sensitivity analysis shows that the total cost and risk could simultaneously be reduced if the delivery time limit is relaxed or if the transfer time is shortened.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207