Adrenal insufficiency among children treated with hormonal therapy for infantile spasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hormonal therapy is a standard treatment for children with infantile spasms. However, the high doses given and long treatment duration expose patients to the risk of adrenal insufficiency (AI). This study aims to quantify the cumulative incidence of AI among children with infantile spasms treated with high-dose corticosteroids and/or adrenocorticotropic hormone. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients treated for infantile spasms was performed between January 2009 and March 2020 in one pediatric specialized hospital. Variables collected include patient and treatment characteristics, risk factors of AI, and adrenal function testing. Analysis included descriptive statistics such as incidence and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included and received a total of 33 courses of treatment (17 corticosteroids [prednisone/prednisolone], 12 adrenocorticotropic hormone, and four combined). Physiologic hydrocortisone replacement therapy with stress supplementation was received after 32 of 33 (97%) courses of treatment. Adrenal function was assessed in 32 of 33 (97%) and AI occurred in 25 of 33 (76%, 95% confidence interval = 58-89). No predictive factor of AI was identified after hormonal treatment. No drug regimen was found to be safe. The two patients who developed an acute adrenal crisis presented to the emergency room within the days (between 2 and 7) following weaning off of hormonal treatment. They were the youngest children of the cohort, and both received prednisolone. SIGNIFICANCE: Adrenal insufficiency is frequent and can potentially lead to an adrenal crisis in this population. This study highlights the necessity of hydrocortisone replacement therapy until AI has been excluded in a patient who has received hormonal therapy to treat infantile spasms. As such, routine laboratory assessment of adrenal function should be done in all patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".