MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283655307 · doi:10.23890/ijast.vm03is01.0102

A Leader-Follower Trajectory Tracking Controller for Multi-Quadrotor Formation Flight

2022· article· en· W4283655307 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aviation Science and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)TrajectoryLyapunov functionController (irrigation)Lyapunov stabilityDisplacement (psychology)Nonlinear systemConstant (computer programming)Tracking (education)Computer scienceControl engineeringNonlinear controlControl (management)EngineeringAdaptive controlArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work is to design a control system based on modern control methods to control flight formations of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. A leader-follower methodology is implemented where the leader vehicle has some predefined trajectory, and the follower vehicles are controlled in order to track the leader while keeping a constant displacement. The formation control system, responsible for the vehicle formation, considers, at first, only the motion at a constant height, and secondly, the three-dimensional motion. In both cases, the nonlinear control laws are derived based on Lyapunov stability theory and the Backstepping method. The control laws are validated in simulation, resorting to a realistic environment and vehicle models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it