MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283655307 · doi:10.23890/ijast.vm03is01.0102

A Leader-Follower Trajectory Tracking Controller for Multi-Quadrotor Formation Flight

2022· article· en· W4283655307 on OpenAlexaff
Diogo Ferrei̇ra, Paulo Oliveira, Afzal Suleman

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Aviation Science and Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingControl theory (sociology)TrajectoryLyapunov functionController (irrigation)Lyapunov stabilityDisplacement (psychology)Nonlinear systemConstant (computer programming)Tracking (education)Computer scienceControl engineeringNonlinear controlControl (management)EngineeringAdaptive controlArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work is to design a control system based on modern control methods to control flight formations of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. A leader-follower methodology is implemented where the leader vehicle has some predefined trajectory, and the follower vehicles are controlled in order to track the leader while keeping a constant displacement. The formation control system, responsible for the vehicle formation, considers, at first, only the motion at a constant height, and secondly, the three-dimensional motion. In both cases, the nonlinear control laws are derived based on Lyapunov stability theory and the Backstepping method. The control laws are validated in simulation, resorting to a realistic environment and vehicle models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Aviation Science and TechnologySame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207