MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283695993 · doi:10.35931/aq.v16i5.1161

Persepsi Wirausahawan terhadap Perkembangan Usaha di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

2022· article· id· W4283695993 on OpenAlexaff
Juni Artha Juneli, Fanny Destiani, Ammalia Syifa Awaliyah, Dadan Nugraha

Bibliographic record

VenueAl Qalam Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persepsi diartikan sebagai suatu proses mengenali, menyusun serta menafsirkan suatu informasi guna memberikan pemahaman yang berguna mengenai informasi tersebut. Penelitian ini mengangkat mengenai persepsi wirausahawan terhadap usaha dimasa pandemi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apa saja yang dirasakan wirausahawan terhadap kegiatan usahanya selama pandemi ini. Partisipan pada penelitian ini adalah satu orang wirausahawan dengan kegiatan usaha membuka warung kecil di rumah pribadinya yang berada di wilayah, Kabupaten Sumedang, Jawa Barat. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik kuisioner dan observasi serta dilaksanakan dengan cara wawancara secara langsung kepada pelaku usaha. Pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu pendekatan kualitatif dan desain penelitiannya adalah studi kasus. Masa pandemi saat ini dikatakan membawa dampak buruk bagi pelaku usaha. Sebab, dengan adanya masa pandemi penghasilan yang didapat menjadi berkurang dari yang biasanya. Selain itu, dikarenakan banyaknya orang yang mengalami PHK maka persaingan dagang dilingkungan pun semakin merebak. Hal tersebut menjadikan pelaku usaha untuk lebih keras lagi memutar pikiran guna menghadapi persaingan pasar dan menstabilkan pendapatan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1970.080

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAl Qalam Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan KemasyarakatanSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207