MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283703245 · doi:10.5383/juspn.17.01.005

Towards Performance of NLP Transformers on URL-Based Phishing Detection for Mobile Devices

2022· article· en· W4283703245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hossein Shirazi, Katherine Haynes, Indrakshi Ray

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhishingComputer scienceTransformerArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDeep learningMobile deviceArtificial neural networkSocial mediaVocabularyWorld Wide WebThe InternetEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ackers are increasingly launching phishing attacks via SMS and social media. Games and dating apps introduce yet another attack vector. However, current deep learning-based phishing detection applications do not apply to mobile devices due to the computational burden. We propose a lightweight phishing detection algorithm that distinguishes phishing from legitimate websites solely from URLs to be used in mobile devices. As a baseline performance, we apply Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to URL-based and HTML-based website features. A model search results in 15 ANN models with accuracies >96%, comparable to state-of-the-art approaches. Next, we test the performance of deep ANNs on URLbased features only; however, all models perform poorly with the highest accuracy of 86.2%, indicating that URL-based features alone are not adequate to detect phishing websites even with deep ANNs. Since language transformers learn to represent context-dependent text sequences, we hypothesize that they will be able to learn directly from the text in URLs to distinguish between legitimate and malicious websites. We apply three state-of-the-art deep transformers (BERT, ELECTRA, and RoBERTa) for phishing detection. Testing custom and standard vocabularies, we find that pre-trained transformers available for immediate use (with fine-tuning) outperform the model trained with the custom URL-based vocabulary. In addition, we test a thinner BERT transformer which is suitable for lightweight devices like mobiles, called MobileBERT. Our results emphasize that evaluation metrics of this model are competitive to other models in this study, yet the testing time is significantly less, making this model a choice for embedding phishing detection algorithms in mobile phones. Using pre-trained transformers to predict phishing websites from only URLs has five advantages: 1) requires little training time (230 to 320 s), 2) is more easily updatable than feature-based approaches because no pre-processing of URLs is required, 3) is safer to use because phishing websites can be predicted without physically visiting the malicious sites, 4) is easily deployable for real-time detection and is applicable to run on mobile devices, and 5) using a mobile specific transformer yields comparable performance and predicts 3 times faster than the other transformer models in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive NetworksSame topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207