MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283706597 · doi:10.5539/ells.v12n3p1

The Establishment of the Theme of Evil Through Imagery in Othello

2022· article· en· W4283706597 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huang Min

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language and Literature Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheme (computing)AestheticsMeaning (existential)Relevance (law)PsychologySociologyArtEpistemologyPhilosophyComputer scienceLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Othello, hailed as one of four major Shakespeare’s tragedies, is a play in which various types of imagery can be found. As with most of Shakespeare’s plays, the function of imagery is to aid not only characterization but also the reinforcement of the main themes as it helps to convey meaning, establish the dramatic atmosphere of the play and facilitate the audience’s understanding of the play. This essay tends to examine the symbolic and contrasting imagery employed in Othello and discuss its relevance to the theme of evil in the play. In Othello, the symbolic theft and animal images, loaded with evil content and evil intention, are evilly employed to manipulate and destroy others while the contrasting black and white images as well as Othello’s lofty and low images picturesquely highlight the devastating effect of evil. By this approach, the theme of evil is thereby elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.026
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language and Literature StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207