MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283706657 · doi:10.1002/sim.9509

Augmented weighting estimators for the additive rates model under multivariate recurrent event data with missing event type

2022· article· en· W4283706657 on OpenAlex
Huijuan Ma, Weicai Pang, Liuquan Sun, Wei Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInverse probability weightingMissing dataMultivariate statisticsEstimatorEvent (particle physics)Nonparametric statisticsComputer scienceInverse probabilityStatisticsWeightingEconometricsData miningMathematicsMedicineBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multivariate recurrent event data are frequently encountered in biomedical and epidemiological studies when subjects experience multiple types of recurrent events. In practice, the event type information may be missing due to a variety of reasons. In this article, we consider a semiparametric additive rates model for multivariate recurrent event data with missing event types. We develop the augmented inverse probability weighting technique to handle event types that are missing at random. The nonparametric kernel-assisted proposals for the missing mechanisms are studied. The resulting estimator is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal. Extensive simulation studies and a real data application are provided to illustrate the validity and practical utility of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it