MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283710441 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2100063

An <i>In Situ</i> Decarbonation Kinetic Study of Calcite Using Synchrotron Radiation XRD

2022· article· en· W4283710441 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuanjiang Liu, Kenan Han, Duojun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalciteNucleationMineralogyMaterials scienceIsothermal processThermodynamicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In situ decarbonation kinetics of calcite were investigated at high temperatures, up to 900 °C, using synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction. The sequence of X-ray diffraction spectra reveals that calcite begins to thermally decompose into lime (CaO) and CO2 at 800 °C and ambient pressure. The decarbonation degree gradually increases with temperature, and calcite completely transforms into lime at 900 °C. The kinetic analysis of the isothermal data using an Avrami model involving nucleation and growth yields the values for the decarbonation rate and reaction order. Our results indicate that the decarbonation rate increases from 2.89 × 10–4s–1 to 3.48 × 10–3s–1 with elevated temperature from 840 to 880 °C, showing a positive temperature dependence on the reaction rate. The calculated Avrami exponent (n) values between 1.35 and 2.38 suggest that the thermal decomposition of calcite should be mainly dominated by homogeneous nucleation and CO2 diffusion-controlled growth. In natural carbonate fault rocks, the decarbonation of CaCO3 caused by frictional heating may be strengthened by the action of high shear velocity. In addition, the resulting ultrafine powder and CO2 pressurization can remarkably reduce the friction coefficient between two fault planes, which further leads to carbonate fault weakening. The yielding result will be conductive to better understanding the role of decarbonation of calcite in some active fault zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207