Participation in Daily Activities Among Women 5 Years After Breast Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Understanding the long-term participation restrictions after breast cancer (BC) is crucial for developing occupation-based interventions. OBJECTIVE: To (1) compare women's participation during the BC subacute phase (2 yr postdiagnosis) with the chronic (5 yr postdiagnosis) phase, (2) explore factors associated with participation in the chronic phase, and (3) describe strategies women use to overcome participation restrictions. DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal study. SETTING: A community health service in Israel. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 30 women (M age = 53.9 yr, SD = 8.3) diagnosed with BC (Stages 1-3). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographic and BC-related symptom questionnaires; an adapted version of the Activity Card Sort, used to assess retained activity levels (RALs) compared with prediagnosis activity levels in sociocultural, physical, and instrumental domains; the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; and one open-ended qualitative question, "How were you able to retain your participation in daily activities despite the long-term effects of BC?" RESULTS: Significantly higher total RALs were found in most domains for women in the chronic (M = 0.93 RAL, SD = 0.27) compared with the subacute (M = 0.71, SD = 0.22) phase, t(29) = 4.72, p < .001. Almost half the women achieved clinically significant change in their meaningful activities. Lower levels of participation were significantly correlated with higher symptom severity. The qualitative findings indicated that coping strategies, such as positive thinking and changing priorities, helped in managing women's participation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participation restrictions and residual BC-related symptoms 5 yr postdiagnosis demonstrated the need for a comprehensive evaluation and early occupational therapy intervention to prevent long-term restrictions. What This Article Adds: This study highlights the value of a comprehensive assessment of daily participation (i.e., participation in various activity domains and in specific individual meaningful activities) of women with BC. The combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis provided a subjective perspective and deeper understanding of the associations among long-term symptoms, participation restrictions, and coping strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".