MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283711843 · doi:10.9734/bpi/codhr/v1/3052b

Global Health Resilience Building: A Population Health Equity Approach to the Agro-Pastoralist Community in Drought Affected Ethiopia

2022· book-chapter· en· W4283711843 on OpenAlexaff
Selim M. Khan, James Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueBook Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International) · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural risk and resilience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationHealth equityLivelihoodPopulation healthBusinessFood securityEconomic growthAgricultureGeographyHealth careSocioeconomicsDevelopment economicsEnvironmental healthEconomicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Devastating droughts have been ravaging Africa for decades. Ethiopia is the worst-hit country as it’s economy predominantly depends on rain-fed farming and livestock. The agriculture sector contributes nearly 85% of the country’s livelihoods. The drought has threatened agro-economy and health of over 15 million agro-pastoralist population who herd the largest livestock in Africa. While foreign aids could be a temporary relief, Sendai framework for Disaster Risk Reduction prioritizes proactive response to promote resilience for the affected people. Applying a population health equity approach can serve the purpose by exploring the determinants, their impacts on the differential health outcomes for the population sub-groups and addressing the health inequity to improve the overall health of the population. Our objective was to identify the critical population health outcomes, underlying determinants, and the leverage points for actions that could guide effective policies interventions for building health resilience for the vulnerable agro-pastoralist population in Ethiopia. To summarize and assess the quality of data, we utilized the PRISMA and Hamilton tools, respectively. We used disaster vulnerability and the WHO's socioeconomic determinants of health and health equity frameworks to synthesize evidence Our analyses showed that to identify policy and leverage areas for effective population health interventions, researchers looked at socioeconomic, political, and cultural backgrounds. Health issues are diverse that revolve around the major determinants of health such as food security, infrastructure, health systems, disaster preparedness, household productivity or income, livestock dependence and access to the market economy. The socioeconomic, political, and cultural environments - all have an impact on these factors. Despite extreme vulnerability and health inequalities, modern public health field practices have yielded some potentials for policy solutions. To achieve the greatest impact on health resilience, the recommended interventions might be guided by an interdisciplinary population health approach. Evidence from Africa's worst drought niche can help address comparable drought-related health challenges in other parts of the continent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0030.015
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook Publisher International (a part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International)Same topicAgricultural risk and resilienceFrench-language works237,207