Transconjunctival XEN45 Implantation for Glaucoma Performed at the Slit Lamp: A Pilot Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRCIS: This pilot study of ab externo implantation of a gel microstent is a novel, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery performed at the slit lamp that is effective for lowering intraocular pressure in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of gel microstent (XEN Gel Stent, Allergan, Irvine, CA) implantation using an ab externo approach in an office setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter chart review examined outcomes in patients with uncontrolled glaucoma receiving maximally tolerated medical therapy, who underwent slit lamp ab externo gel stent implantation. At postoperative visit, the IOP, the number of glaucoma medications, the final position of the stent, and the needling rate were analyzed. Assessments were conducted 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the implantation. Treatment success was defined as IOP ≥6 mm Hg and ≤18 mm Hg with ≥20% reduction from presurgical IOP, with or without medications. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes from 28 patients were included. Mean preoperative IOP was 24.1±8.0 mm Hg on 3.2±0.9 glaucoma medications. At 12 months postoperative, IOP was reduced to 15.4±4.7 mm Hg on 0.6±1.0 medications; 46.9% and 81.3% of eyes achieved complete and partial success, respectively. The gel stent was properly positioned in 94.1% of eyes after 1 attempt at implantation and in 100% of eyes after a second attempt. In addition to malpositioning, observed complications included occlusion, erosion, and endophthalmitis following anterior chamber reformation. Adjunctive needling was required in 21% of implanted eyes. CONCLUSION: Slit-lamp-based transconjunctival XEN45 implantation reduced intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients in the first year of this pilot study and was most commonly associated with wound leak and hypotony among other adverse events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".