Incorporating previously neglected excess oxygen associated with ferric iron in matrix corrections of microprobe data from cubic and rhombohedral Fe-Ti oxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Estimates of the oxidation states of magmas are important to current investigations of the geo-chemical characteristics of their source regions and of evolved magmatic series created during differentiation. One means of achieving such estimates is to capitalize on compositions of coexisting cubic and rhombohedral Fe-Ti oxides determined by electron microprobe. A combination of experimental calibration points and thermodynamic modeling provides a basis for translating such compositions into T-fO2 values. This has been done until recently by estimating Fe3+/ΣFe on the basis of charge balance and stoichiometry by the method of Droop (1987), after matrix corrections of X-ray intensity data have been performed, as EPMA cannot be used routinely to distinguish different elemental valence states, much less accurately quantify abundances of Fe3+ and Fe2+. The traditional approach of undertaking post-data-reduction calculations falls short of attaining the best possible quantitative results. The tactical choice of not accounting for light elements that have not been explicitly analyzed prior to matrix corrections of X-ray intensity data leads to systematic errors in reported oxide abundances for measured elements. This article addresses one such issue, the oxygen associated with Fe3+ (hereafter “excess oxygen”), on the basis of coexisting Fe-Ti oxides from Andean lavas. A new software routine in probe for EPMA (PFE) uses an iterative calculation scheme to calculate amounts of excess oxygen that would not be considered if all iron were assumed to be ferrous and then applies this excess oxygen during matrix corrections. The PFE approach reveals that Fe-concentrations have been underestimated, universally, in these minerals because O atoms absorb FeKα radiation: discrepancies increase as total Fe and Fe3+/Fe2+, hence excess oxygen, increase. Analyses of the most Fe-rich cubic oxide compositions in this data set have ~6 wt% excess oxygen and ~1 wt% more FeO+Fe2O3 than would be reported without incorporating the impact of excess oxygen in matrix corrections. Minor to negligible differences in other elements are also observed. These effects are not because excess oxygen is directly attributed to these elements, although some may be present in multiple valence states, as matrix corrections are undertaken on the basis of the conventional assumptions that they occur as Cr3+, V3+, Mn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Si4+. Rather, variably small increases in total Fe propagate through the matrix corrections for other elements, and these differences may be recorded as minor increases or decreases in some concentrations, depending on the particular element and the amount of change in Fe-concentration. Fe3+/ΣFe in analyses produced with the PFE routine are essentially identical to those determined in the traditional mode, as cation proportions calculated on the basis of charge balance and stoichiometry, with the method of Droop (1987), is a necessary step. The new method: (1) provides more accurate concentrations, mainly for Fe and Ti; (2) is applicable to any mineral containing ferric iron (subject to stoichiometric constraints); (3) provides more accurate analytical totals, which can be advantageous for evaluating analytical quality; and (4) does not impact estimates of oxidation state. Oxygen fugacities and temperatures determined with the model of Ghiorso and Evans (2008) are essentially unchanged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".