MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283717175 · doi:10.2138/am-2022-8447

Incorporating previously neglected excess oxygen associated with ferric iron in matrix corrections of microprobe data from cubic and rhombohedral Fe-Ti oxides

2022· article· en· W4283717175 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Dungan, John Donovan, Andrew J. Locock, E. S. Bullock

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectron microprobeValence (chemistry)FerrousOxygenMatrix (chemical analysis)StoichiometryOxideMicroprobeMössbauer spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMaterials scienceMineralogyMetallurgyCrystallographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Estimates of the oxidation states of magmas are important to current investigations of the geo-chemical characteristics of their source regions and of evolved magmatic series created during differentiation. One means of achieving such estimates is to capitalize on compositions of coexisting cubic and rhombohedral Fe-Ti oxides determined by electron microprobe. A combination of experimental calibration points and thermodynamic modeling provides a basis for translating such compositions into T-fO2 values. This has been done until recently by estimating Fe3+/ΣFe on the basis of charge balance and stoichiometry by the method of Droop (1987), after matrix corrections of X-ray intensity data have been performed, as EPMA cannot be used routinely to distinguish different elemental valence states, much less accurately quantify abundances of Fe3+ and Fe2+. The traditional approach of undertaking post-data-reduction calculations falls short of attaining the best possible quantitative results. The tactical choice of not accounting for light elements that have not been explicitly analyzed prior to matrix corrections of X-ray intensity data leads to systematic errors in reported oxide abundances for measured elements. This article addresses one such issue, the oxygen associated with Fe3+ (hereafter “excess oxygen”), on the basis of coexisting Fe-Ti oxides from Andean lavas. A new software routine in probe for EPMA (PFE) uses an iterative calculation scheme to calculate amounts of excess oxygen that would not be considered if all iron were assumed to be ferrous and then applies this excess oxygen during matrix corrections. The PFE approach reveals that Fe-concentrations have been underestimated, universally, in these minerals because O atoms absorb FeKα radiation: discrepancies increase as total Fe and Fe3+/Fe2+, hence excess oxygen, increase. Analyses of the most Fe-rich cubic oxide compositions in this data set have ~6 wt% excess oxygen and ~1 wt% more FeO+Fe2O3 than would be reported without incorporating the impact of excess oxygen in matrix corrections. Minor to negligible differences in other elements are also observed. These effects are not because excess oxygen is directly attributed to these elements, although some may be present in multiple valence states, as matrix corrections are undertaken on the basis of the conventional assumptions that they occur as Cr3+, V3+, Mn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and Si4+. Rather, variably small increases in total Fe propagate through the matrix corrections for other elements, and these differences may be recorded as minor increases or decreases in some concentrations, depending on the particular element and the amount of change in Fe-concentration. Fe3+/ΣFe in analyses produced with the PFE routine are essentially identical to those determined in the traditional mode, as cation proportions calculated on the basis of charge balance and stoichiometry, with the method of Droop (1987), is a necessary step. The new method: (1) provides more accurate concentrations, mainly for Fe and Ti; (2) is applicable to any mineral containing ferric iron (subject to stoichiometric constraints); (3) provides more accurate analytical totals, which can be advantageous for evaluating analytical quality; and (4) does not impact estimates of oxidation state. Oxygen fugacities and temperatures determined with the model of Ghiorso and Evans (2008) are essentially unchanged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207