Safety and uptake of fully oxidized β-carotene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spontaneous oxidation of β-carotene yields a polymer-rich product (OxBC) also containing small amounts of many apocarotenoids. OxBC extends β-carotene’s benefits beyond vitamin A, finding utility in supporting health in livestock, pets, and humans. Although naturally occurring OxBC is consumed in foods and feeds, a direct demonstration here of safety of synthetic OxBC supports its increasing usage. A toxicological study in rats showed a maximum tolerated single oral dose, an LD 50 , and a NOAEL of 5,000, 30,079 and 1875 mg/kg body weight, respectively. The repeat-dose 90-day oral toxicity study showed no adverse physiological or pathological effects. A first study of OxBC uptake by mice over 2-5 days into a select set of tissues showed OxBC already was naturally present. The highest levels were in liver, lung, and hamstring. Despite dosing, no net increases occurred in liver, kidney, lung, and muscle. Net increases occurred in urine, intestinal content, plasma, feces, spleen, and cecum, consistent with processing of OxBC and preferential elimination of polymer. Compared to the 4:1 polymer: apocarotenoid ratio of OxBC, polymer was enriched in liver and spleen and depleted in lung, kidney, hamstring, and abdominal muscle. The apparent control of OxBC in major tissues further supports its safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".