MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283722432 · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00036-9

New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA

2022· article· en· W4283722432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLiving Reviews in Relativity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeYork UniversityPerimeter Institute
FundersAmaldi Research CenterAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCenter for Research and Development in Mathematics and ApplicationsFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónGeneralitat de CatalunyaUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignOwens Family FoundationNuclear Safety and Security CommissionGrantová Agentura České RepublikyCERNCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesUniversity of ArizonaAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungSimons FoundationMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationFundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de BarcelonaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGravitational waveGravitationTheoretical physicsInterferometrySpace (punctuation)Quantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) has the potential to reveal wonders about the fundamental theory of nature at play in the extreme gravity regime, where the gravitational interaction is both strong and dynamical. In this white paper, the Fundamental Physics Working Group of the LISA Consortium summarizes the current topics in fundamental physics where LISA observations of gravitational waves can be expected to provide key input. We provide the briefest of reviews to then delineate avenues for future research directions and to discuss connections between this working group, other working groups and the consortium work package teams. These connections must be developed for LISA to live up to its science potential in these areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it