KCNQ2 R144 variants cause neurodevelopmental disability with language impairment and autistic features without neonatal seizures through a gain-of-function mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have revealed remarkable phenotypic heterogeneity in KCNQ2-related disorders, correlated with effects on biophysical features of heterologously expressed channels. Here, we assessed phenotypes and functional properties associated with KCNQ2 missense variants R144W, R144Q, and R144G. We also explored in vitro blockade of channels carrying R144Q mutant subunits by amitriptyline. METHODS: Patients were identified using the RIKEE database and through clinical collaborators. Phenotypes were collected by a standardized questionnaire. Functional and pharmacological properties of variant subunits were analyzed by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. FINDINGS: Detailed clinical information on fifteen patients (14 novel and 1 previously published) was analyzed. All patients had developmental delay with prominent language impairment. R144Q patients were more severely affected than R144W patients. Infantile to childhood onset epilepsy occurred in 40%, while 67% of sleep-EEGs showed sleep-activated epileptiform activity. Ten patients (67%) showed autistic features. Activation gating of homomeric Kv7.2 R144W/Q/G channels was left-shifted, suggesting gain-of-function effects. Amitriptyline blocked channels containing Kv7.2 and Kv7.2 R144Q subunits. INTERPRETATION: Patients carrying KCNQ2 R144 gain-of-function variants have developmental delay with prominent language impairment, autistic features, often accompanied by infantile- to childhood-onset epilepsy and EEG sleep-activated epileptiform activity. The absence of neonatal seizures is a robust and important clinical differentiator between KCNQ2 gain-of-function and loss-of-function variants. The Kv7.2/7.3 channel blocker amitriptyline might represent a targeted treatment. FUNDING: Supported by FWO, GSKE, KCNQ2-Cure, Jack Pribaz Foundation, European Joint Programme on Rare Disease 2020, the Italian Ministry for University and Research, the Italian Ministry of Health, the European Commission, the University of Antwerp, NINDS, and Chalk Family Foundation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".