« On choisit son économie, pas sa société ». Transition et pensée économique au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspiré de l’analyse originale de Gilles Dostaler sur les transitions dans l’histoire de la pensée économique, cet article montre que les premiers penseurs de l’économie québécoise percevaient leur objet comme un phénomène localisé dans le temps et l’espace et non comme un phénomène universel. À partir d’une sociologie de la connaissance économique, nous ferons état des continuités entre, d’une part, la configuration sociale des pratiques économiques et de la connaissance qui en est constitutive et, d’autre part, les apports originaux des premiers penseurs de l’économie québécoise qui vont confronter ces savoirs de leur société aux savoirs dominants en sciences économiques. En examinant les traits marquants des travaux des Parent, Gérin-Lajoie, Gérin, Montpetit et Minville, comme ceux d’économistes québécois contemporains comme Dostaler, nous constatons, en plus de la genèse hétérodoxe de la connaissance de l’économie canadienne-française, des tentatives de redéfinition des sciences économiques sur de nouvelles bases utiles pour appréhender la « transition » écologique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".