MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recuperar un retrato perdido: Josefa Mónica Fernández de Alvarado y Lezo, marquesa de Espeja (1765-1826), traductora de Zanotti, Condillac y Erasmus Darwin

2022· article· es· W4283733001 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine M. Jaffe, Elisa Martín-Valdepeñas Yagüe

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Estudios del Siglo XVIII · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
FundersFundación MapfreUniversidad de SalamancaModernaLouisiana State University
KeywordsHumanitiesArtErasmus+PhilosophyArt historyThe Renaissance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Josefa Mónica Fernández de Alvarado, marquesa de Espeja (1765-1826) fue socia de la Junta de Damas de la Real Sociedad Económica Matritense de Amigos del País y contribuyó a la circulación de las ideas durante la Ilustración. Sus traducciones de Zanotti y Condillac fueron muy apreciadas por su mérito literario. En su retrato, obra de Antonio Poza, ella aparece junto a sus dos obras, resaltando su labor de traductora. Su traducción de Erasmus Darwin permanece inédita, pero no se conserva. Este artículo ofrece una semblanza biográfica, analiza sus traducciones y estrategias de traducción, caracterizadas por la fidelidad a los textos originales, la pulcritud, un alto grado de habilidad lingüística y su propósito de dirigirse a una comunidad de mujeres lectoras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de Estudios del Siglo XVIIISame topicLiterary and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207