Antioxidant System and Ions Concentrations After Femoral Neck and Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oxidative stress is a disruption of the pro-oxidative-antioxidant balance, caused by excessive production or ineffective removal of reactive oxygen species. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 42 male patients aged 38 to 69 years. The first group consisted of 21 men with osteoarthritis after primary hip arthroplasty using the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant. The second group included 21 men after hip arthroplasty using the femoral neck SPIRON K-implant. In both groups, concentrations of ions, the antioxidant system in the blood, and parameters of oxidative stress were evaluated twice. Clinical assessment using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Harris Hip Score, and Short Form (12) Health Survey (SF-12) scales was performed. RESULTS Concentrations of metal ions in the blood and the level of oxidative stress were significantly higher in the resurfacing group than in the femoral neck arthroplasty group. The response of the antioxidant system was significantly greater in the femoral neck arthroplasty group. During clinical evaluation, groups did not show significant differences, with the exception of greater shortening of the operated limb and a lower score in the mental-sphere of the SF-12 scale in the resurfacing arthroplasty group. CONCLUSIONS Resurfacing hip arthroplasty increased oxidative stress, increased the concentration of metal ions, and did not affect alignment of the abbreviation of the operated limb. A significant improvement in the quality of life of patients in the mental sphere according to the SF-12 occurred after the application of resurfacing arthroplasty, in the first month after the procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".