Manifestasi Gerakan Sosial Baru dalam Krisis Iklim (Studi Kasus: Extinction Rebellion Indonesia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dekade ini, perubahan iklim bukan hanya suatu fenomena alam melainkan sebuah permasalahan sosial yang berdampak sangat luas bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Belum banyak dikaji melalui perpsektif sosial, penelitian ini berusaha mengidentifikasi sebuah fenomena baru dalam pergerakan isu krisis iklim di Indonesia. Menggunakan teori gerakan sosial baru sebagai pisau analisis, penelitian ini mengambil strategi gerakan sebagai fokus utamanya, dengan studi kasus Extinction Rebellion Indonesia (XR). Bertujuan untuk mengetahui strategi perjuangan yang digunakan Extinction Rebellion dalam mencapai tujuan-tujuannya, penelitian ini menyimpulkan strategi gerakan sosial baru yang diusung Extinction Rebellion Indonesia berhasil mencapai tujuannya dalam menyadarkan masyarakat akan gentingnya isu iklim melalui metode nir kekerasan dengan penerapan strategi keterlibatan kritis (critical engagement).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".