Manifestasi Gerakan Sosial Baru dalam Krisis Iklim (Studi Kasus: Extinction Rebellion Indonesia)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dekade ini, perubahan iklim bukan hanya suatu fenomena alam melainkan sebuah permasalahan sosial yang berdampak sangat luas bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Belum banyak dikaji melalui perpsektif sosial, penelitian ini berusaha mengidentifikasi sebuah fenomena baru dalam pergerakan isu krisis iklim di Indonesia. Menggunakan teori gerakan sosial baru sebagai pisau analisis, penelitian ini mengambil strategi gerakan sebagai fokus utamanya, dengan studi kasus Extinction Rebellion Indonesia (XR). Bertujuan untuk mengetahui strategi perjuangan yang digunakan Extinction Rebellion dalam mencapai tujuan-tujuannya, penelitian ini menyimpulkan strategi gerakan sosial baru yang diusung Extinction Rebellion Indonesia berhasil mencapai tujuannya dalam menyadarkan masyarakat akan gentingnya isu iklim melalui metode nir kekerasan dengan penerapan strategi keterlibatan kritis (critical engagement).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it