Electrochemical Stability of ZnMn<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>: Understanding Zn-Ion Rechargeable Battery Capacity and Degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a refined Mn–Zn–H 2 O Pourbaix diagram with the emphasis on parameters relevant for the Zn/MnO 2 rechargeable cells. It maps out boundaries of electrochemical stability for MnO 2, ZnMn 2 O 4, ZnMn 3 O 7, and MnOOH. The diagram helps to rationalize experimental observation on processes and phases occurring during charge/discharge, including the position of charge/discharge redox peaks and capacity fade observed in rechargeable aqueous Zn-ion batteries for stationary storage. The proposed Pourbaix diagram is validated by observing the pH-dependent transformation of electrolytic manganese dioxide to hetaerolite and chalcophanite during discharge and charge, respectively. Our results can guide the selection of operating conditions (the potential range and pH) for existing aqueous Zn/MnO 2 rechargeable cells to maximise their longevity. In addition, the relation between electrochemical stability boundaries and operating conditions can be used as an additional design criterion in exploration of future cathode materials for aqueous rechargeable batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".