MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4283738049 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244445

<i>Euclid</i>: Forecasts from the void-lensing cross-correlation

2022· article· en· W4283738049 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Bonici, C. Carbone, S. Davini, P Vielzeuf, L. Paganin, V. F. Cardone, Nico Hamaus, Alice Pisani, A. J. Hawken, András Kovács, S. Nadathur, S. Contarini, G Verza, I. Tutusaus, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini, M Aubert, C. Giocoli, Alkistis Pourtsidou, S. Camera, S. Escoffier, A. Caminata, S. Di Domizio, M. Martinelli, M. Pallavicini, V. Pettorino, Z. Sakr, D. Sapone, S. Tosi, Victoria Yankelevich, A. Amara, N. Auricchio, Marco Baldi, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, J. Brinchmann, V. Capobianco, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, S. Cavuoti, R. Cledassou, G. Congedo, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, L. Corcione, F. Courbin, M. Cropper, A. Da Silva, H. Degaudenzi, M. Douspis, F. Dubath, C. A. J. Duncan, X. Dupac, S. Dusini, A. Ealet, S. Farrens, P. Fosalba, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, M. Fumana, P. Gómez-Alvarez, B. Garilli, B. Gillis, A Enia, F. Grupp, L. Guzzo, S. V. H. Haugan, W. Holmes, F. Hormuth, A. Hornstrup, K. Jahnkę, M. Kümmel, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, M. Kilbinger, M. Kunz, H. Kurki‐Suonio, R. Laureijs, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, I. Lloro, E. Maiorano, O. Mansutti, O. Marggraf, K. Markovič, R. Massey, E. Medinaceli, M. Melchior, M. Meneghetti, G. Meylan, M. Moresco, E. Munari, S. M. Niemi, C. Padilla, S. Paltani, F. Pasian, K. Pedersen, Will J. Percival, S. Pires, G. Polenta, M. Poncet, L. Popa, F. Raison, R. Rébolo, A. Renzi, J. Rhodes, E. Rossetti, R. Saglia, B. Sartoris, M. Scodeggio, A. Secroun, G. Seidel, C. Sirignano, G. Sirri, L. Stanco, Jean‐Luc Starck, C. Surace, P. Tallada-Crespí, D. Tavagnacco, A. N. Taylor, I. Tereno, R. Toledo-Moreo, F Torradeflot, E. A. Valentijn, L. Valenziano, Yun Wang, J. Weller, G. Zamorani, J. Zoubian, S. Andreon

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersStaatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und InnovationFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNorsk RomsenterAgenția Spațială RomânăScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaAcademy of FinlandNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEuropean Space AgencyDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsWeak gravitational lensingPhysicsDark energyAstrophysicsGalaxyCluster analysisVoid (composites)Gravitational lensing formalismParameter spaceRedshiftStatistical physicsCosmologyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Euclid space telescope will survey a large dataset of cosmic voids traced by dense samples of galaxies. In this work we estimate its expected performance when exploiting angular photometric void clustering, galaxy weak lensing, and their cross-correlation. To this aim, we implemented a Fisher matrix approach tailored for voids from the Euclid photometric dataset and we present the first forecasts on cosmological parameters that include the void-lensing correlation. We examined two different probe settings, pessimistic and optimistic, both for void clustering and galaxy lensing. We carried out forecast analyses in four model cosmologies, accounting for a varying total neutrino mass, M ν , and a dynamical dark energy (DE) equation of state, w ( z ), described by the popular Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parametrization. We find that void clustering constraints on h and Ω b are competitive with galaxy lensing alone, while errors on n s decrease thanks to the orthogonality of the two probes in the 2D-projected parameter space. We also note that, as a whole, with respect to assuming the two probes as independent, the inclusion of the void-lensing cross-correlation signal improves parameter constraints by 10 − 15%, and enhances the joint void clustering and galaxy lensing figure of merit (FoM) by 10% and 25%, in the pessimistic and optimistic scenarios, respectively. Finally, when further combining with the spectroscopic galaxy clustering, assumed as an independent probe, we find that, in the most competitive case, the FoM increases by a factor of 4 with respect to the combination of weak lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering taken as independent probes. The forecasts presented in this work show that photometric void clustering and its cross-correlation with galaxy lensing deserve to be exploited in the data analysis of the Euclid galaxy survey and promise to improve its constraining power, especially on h , Ω b , the neutrino mass, and the DE evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→