MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283740282 · doi:10.4000/emam.3977

Ankawa : nouvel épicentre du christianisme irakien ?

2022· article· fr· W4283740282 on OpenAlexaff
David Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers d’EMAM · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis l’invasion américaine de l’Irak, en 2003, la géographie du christianisme irakien a connu de nombreux changements. Parmi les plus remarquables d’entre eux figure la transformation de la municipalité d’Ankawa, banlieue chrétienne d’Erbil, capitale de la région autonome du Kurdistan irakien. En effet, cette dernière constitue désormais la nouvelle vitrine de la mosaïque chrétienne en Irak. Or, peut-on affirmer pour autant qu’Ankawa se soit substituée à Bagdad, capitale de l’Irak, en tant qu’épicentre de la chrétienté irakienne ? C’est qu’en dépit d’une diminution marquée du nombre de chrétiens à Bagdad, le maintien d’une présence significative dans la première ville d’Irak constitue toujours un enjeu majeur pour la communauté chrétienne du pays. Entre Erbil et Bagdad, les chrétiens irakiens apparaissent ainsi contraints d’opérer un acte d’équilibrisme [balancing act] afin de s’assurer d’un avenir en Irak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers d’EMAMSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207