MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283751516 · doi:10.1190/geo2021-0654.1

Accelerating seismic scattered noise attenuation in offset-vector tile domain: Application of deep learning

2022· article· en· W4283751516 on OpenAlexaff
Dawei Liu, Xiaokai Wang, Yang Xiaohai, Haibo Mao, Mauricio D. Sacchi, Wenchao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceOffset (computer science)ResidualArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionDeep learningWaveletNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Recent years have witnessed many practical applications of supervised deep learning in seismic processing. However, a weak generalization behavior prevents widespread implementation on large-scale prestack data sets for coherent noise attenuation. This is particularly true when addressing strong near-surface scattered noise in land seismic data. To alleviate this problem, we have combined deep learning with an offset-vector tile (OVT) partitioning method to suppress strong scattered noise. With the OVT partitioning method, seismic data are spatially uniformly sampled, offering a favorable foundation for network learning. Specifically, the reflection probability distribution is more stationary than the noise distribution, making it easier for the network to learn the reflections. Accordingly, we use the direct signal learning strategy rather than the commonly used residual learning strategy to train the network. To construct high-quality training labels, we adopt the 3D continuous wavelet transform (3D CWT), which can exploit the 3D spatial correlation in OVT gathers. General use of these labels can produce results similar to 3D CWT but is highly efficient. To further improve denoising performance, we propose a training sample construction approach that leverages middle-offset OVT volumes with varying azimuths in light of midoffset relatively high signal-to-noise ratio characteristics. The field data experiment demonstrates that our proposed method also has an excellent generalization ability. Despite only using six middle-offset gathers for training, the trained network is able to effectively process 1260 OVTs in a timely manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207