MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283752814 · doi:10.56403/nejesh.v1i2.12

Fundamental Analysis of Syari’ah Stock In Jakarta Islamic Index

2022· article· en· W4283752814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oktavima Ningrum

Bibliographic record

VenueNeo Journal of economy and social humanities · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPrice–earnings ratioValue (mathematics)Share priceEconomicsMarket capitalizationQuarter (Canadian coin)Stock (firearms)Index (typography)BusinessInvestment (military)Stock marketFinancial economicsEarnings per shareStock exchangeFinanceStatisticsMathematicsTheologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the growth prospects and fair value of a stock by using fundamental analysis with the EPS (Earning Per Share) and PER (Price To Earning Ratio) methods and price book value determines the investment. The research method used is to use a descriptive method with a qualitative approach from the Annual Financial Reports of 15 Islamic companies that are consistent in the Jakarta Islamic index . The results of this study are Islamic companies in JII have experienced quite rapid growth despite the Covid 19 incident in 2020 but still generate income. The best EPS rating of 15 Syari’ah companies in 2020 in the second quarter is UNTR of 899.51 while the lowest PER level is KLBF of 5.85x. However, if viewed from the market capitalization and the number of shares outstanding, the fair value of KLBF. For Income Ratio to PBV (Price Book Value) results in a decision to sell the stock price.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeo Journal of economy and social humanitiesSame topicFinancial Analysis and Corporate GovernanceFrench-language works237,207