MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283754586 · doi:10.1002/aisy.202200093

Robots as Energy Systems: Advances in Robotics across Scales and Technologies

2022· article· en· W4283754586 on OpenAlexaff
Mihai Duduta

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Intelligent Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDielectric materials and actuators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotRoboticsKey (lock)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEnergy (signal processing)Human–computer interactionSystems engineeringData scienceEngineeringComputer securityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robots are operating at unprecedented scales and in uniquely challenging environments, particularly near the human body. These robots are enabled by novel actuation, sensing, energy storage, and conversion technologies. Across different scales and between different technologies, the key metrics of performance are related on energy: how it is stored, delivered, or dissipated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.012
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Intelligent SystemsSame topicDielectric materials and actuatorsFrench-language works237,207