In vitro test-bed design for bone fracture monitoring using implanted antennas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this chapter, the development and testing of two geometrical human body phantoms based on the recipes that were investigated in Chapter 4 is presented. The first is a two-material phantom consisting of bone cortical and muscle layers simulated in Section 8.1 and measured in Section 8.2. The second is a three-material geometrical phantom consisting of bone marrow, bone cortical and muscle layers simulated and measured in Sections 8.3 and 8.4 accordingly. The specific absorption rate (SAR) evaluation of the test-bed according to the USA, Canada, and European Union standards is conducted in Section 8.5. Two radiofrequency (RF) monopoles were implanted in a multi material phantom, and the condition of a bone fracture representative was replicated. The bone fracture was modelled as a cylinder residing in the mid distance between the implanted monopoles for the simulations. The technique was tested in the measurement section using three multi-material geometric phantoms. The results between simulation and measurements showed good agreement. In this section, the two-monopole system that is used for the simulations and measurements of this chapter is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".