MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283766601 · doi:10.3917/rdn.443.0067

Une villa sous l’abbaye Saint-Calixte de Cysoing

2022· article· fr· W4283766601 on OpenAlexaff
Damien Censier, Héloïse Esteves, Emmanuelle Bonnaire, Caroline Bustos, Cécile Bouet, Étienne Louis

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du Nord · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’opération d’archéologie préventive localisée dans les jardins de l’abbaye Saint-Calixte de Cysoing (Nord) a mis en évidence un site dense et stratifié, occupé sans interruption ou presque de l’Antiquité à la période révolutionnaire. Le premier état de la villa se met en place dans le courant du i er s. av. J.-C. et perdure jusqu’au ii e s. ap. J.-C. Cette occupation, se caractérise par l’édification de constructions sur poteaux plantés illustrant le maintien et l’usage d’une architecture de tradition indigène. Suite à la destruction de l’installation par une série de coulées de boue, l’établissement est reconstruit adoptant alors une architecture de tradition méditerranéenne avec l’érection d’au moins trois constructions en pierre. Ces aménagements de plan rectangulaire et dotés de contreforts sont organisés autour d’une vaste cour. Ces vestiges semblent pouvoir être localisés au sein de la pars rustica . Le bâtiment le mieux préservé, encore doté de ses niveaux d’usage, a fait l’objet d’une observation carpologique. Les résultats de ces analyses associés à un examen détaillé des structures semblent confirmer la fonction de stockage de denrées agricoles pour ce modèle d’aménagement attesté dans de nombreuses villae de Gaule Belgique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du NordSame topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207